The Frustration of Geo-Blocked Content
In today’s interconnected world, it’s frustrating to encounter the message, “This content is not available in your region,” when trying to access your favorite shows or movies on streaming platforms. Despite the global nature of the internet, geographical restrictions—known as geo-blocking—prevent users from accessing content based on their location. While some users turn to Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) to bypass these restrictions, the persistence of geo-blocking raises important questions about the effectiveness and fairness of current intellectual property (IP) laws governing digital content distribution.
The Reality of Geo-Blocking in a Globalized Digital Environment
Geo-blocking is the practice of restricting access to internet content based upon the user’s geographical location. Streaming services like Netflix, Amazon Prime Video, and Disney+ employ geo-blocking to comply with licensing agreements and copyright laws that are territorial in nature.
According to a 2021 report by Statista, approximately 29% of global internet users have used a VPN or proxy service to access better entertainment content. This indicates a significant number of users are willing to circumvent geo-restrictions to access desired content, highlighting a disconnect between consumer demand and content availability.
The Role of IP Law in Geo-Blocking
At the core of geo-blocking is the territorial nature of IP rights and licensing agreements. Content producers often sell distribution rights separately in different countries to maximize revenues and tailor marketing strategies to specific markets. This model, however, conflicts with the borderless nature of the internet, where content can be accessed from anywhere in the world.
The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) notes that “copyright laws are territorial, meaning they are confined to the country or region that grants them.” This territoriality leads to fragmentation in content availability, causing disparities in what users can access based on their location.
Government and Institutional Responses to Geo-Blocking
Recognizing the challenges geo-blocking poses, some governments and institutions have initiated discussions and policies to address the issue.
European Union’s Efforts to Address Geo-Blocking
The European Union (EU) has proactively attempted to reduce unjustified geo-blocking. In December 2018, the EU’s Geo-Blocking Regulation was enacted, prohibiting discrimination based on nationality or place of residence within the EU for online sales of goods and services. However, the regulation does not cover audio-visual services, meaning streaming content remains subject to geo-blocking due to licensing agreements.
In November 2020, the European Parliament adopted a resolution calling for extending the Geo-Blocking Regulation to include audio-visual content. The resolution emphasizes the need to improve cross-border access to online content services and to address the fragmentation of the digital single market.
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission’s (ACCC) Digital Platforms Inquiry
In July 2019, the ACCC released its Digital Platforms Inquiry Final Report, which examined the impact of digital platforms on competition in media and advertising services markets. While the report focused on market power and consumer data issues, it acknowledged that geo-blocking can affect consumer access to content. The ACCC recommended that the Australian government consider measures to enhance consumer access to digital platforms.
United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) and Digital Trade
The USMCA, which entered into force on July 1, 2020, includes digital trade provisions promoting consumer access to online content. While the agreement supports the free flow of information across borders, it respects the rights and obligations under IP laws, meaning geo-blocking practices tied to licensing agreements remain permissible.
Expert Opinions on Geo-Blocking and IP Law Reform
European Consumer Organisation (BEUC)
Monique Goyens, Director General of BEUC, has stated that “consumers are often frustrated when they cannot access digital content or services across borders. Removing unjustified geo-blocking is essential to ensure consumers benefit from the digital single market.”
Professor Martin Kretschmer, University of Glasgow
Professor Kretschmer, an intellectual property law expert, noted that “the territoriality of copyright is increasingly at odds with the expectations of consumers in the digital age. There is a need to rethink how we license and distribute content to better align with the global nature of the internet.”
Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) in Canada
In a 2020 report, PIAC highlighted that geo-blocking “creates artificial barriers that prevent consumers from accessing lawful content and services, undermining the benefits of a digital economy.” The organization advocates for policies that enhance consumer access while respecting creators’ rights.
Calls for Reforming IP Laws to Reflect Digital Realities
The challenges posed by geo-blocking suggest a need to reassess IP laws to better align with the digital environment. This doesn’t mean disregarding the rights of content creators but finding a balance that respects those rights while meeting consumer demand for access.
Enhancing Cross-Border Licensing Agreements
One approach is to encourage and facilitate cross-border licensing agreements. By simplifying the process and reducing the cost of obtaining multi-territory licenses, content providers may be more willing to offer their services across borders. The EU has promoted this idea as part of its Digital Single Market strategy.
Implementing Fair Compensation Mechanisms
Developing new compensation models that fairly reward content creators while allowing broader distribution could alleviate the reliance on strict territorial licensing. This might involve revenue-sharing arrangements or collective licensing schemes that operate across borders.
Why Reform Matters to Consumers and Creators
For consumers, reforming IP laws to reduce geo-blocking would mean greater access to diverse content, enhancing cultural exchange and satisfaction. It could open up new markets and audiences for creators and rights holders, potentially increasing revenues.
However, it’s essential to acknowledge the complexities involved. Rights holders have legitimate interests in controlling the distribution of their content, and regional licensing can be a critical source of funding, especially for local productions. Any reform must carefully balance these interests.
Moving Towards a More Accessible Digital World
Geo-blocking is a symptom of the tension between traditional IP laws and the global nature of the internet. While the practice stems from legitimate legal and economic considerations, it often results in consumer frustration and challenges to the notion of a connected world.
Reforming IP laws to reflect digital realities requires international cooperation and innovative approaches to licensing and compensation. By working towards solutions that respect the rights of creators while enhancing access for consumers, we can move closer to a more inclusive and accessible digital environment.
How Innovation-Ready Is Your Organization?
Take the free Innovation Maturity Diagnostic — a 3-minute self-assessment based on 30 years of field research across 50+ countries.
Take the Diagnostic →More from Innovation Mastered
